I want to thank all of you for your professionalism and deep reflection of data and dedication to student learning. The strengths of SLO's include:
1. High expectations with goals for student learning.
2. Strong assessments to match outcomes.
3. Deep data analysis and reflections on how to help all students grow.
4. Reflection of the impact on teaching strategies with student learning.
5. Dedication to continuous improvement by refining goals and action midyear.
6. Collaboration to improve teaching and learning.
SLO Questions to Ponder: Please add more ideas to the comments!
How do we maintain expectations for writing to be used all of the time?
- Post expectations for student reminders.
- Student self-evaluations
- Hold students accountable
- Focus on a few parts of the rubric at a time.
How do we motivate writers?
- Choice
- Ideas from the workroom were helpful
- Publishing center books available
- Technology- type, apps, dragon dictation
- Collaborative writing,
Should K/1 focus on conventions or craft?
How do we teach peer editing?
- Observe a teacher- Sue Schaeffer uses a 2 sided form with self and peer assessments
- Author chair and edit together as a class
- Use a buddy class to peer assess and improve work
How do we assess papers in an objective and fair manner?
- Use anchor papers or exemplars
- Mix papers to assess in May
How can we appropriately challenge ALL of our writers?
- TARGET Time writing groups- advanced and remedial
- Writing contests
MAPS Questions answered by my friend Lynn Lamers who is a NWEA Trainer
Is there a ceiling on MAPS?
- Technically, there is a
“valid” RIT range of 100-320, but there is no true maximum. Students can
score outside that range.
When do we need to switch from
MAPS 2-5 to a 6+ version?
- Generally speaking, you transition kids at 6th grade. Both tests are capable of reaching above and below the grade range indicated in the name, but of course the 6+ reaches higher and offers more questions as higher level. It also allows for longer reading passages (there is a smaller word limit in the 2-5 test), and the math test goes farther into algebraic concepts. The only reason for not moving 6th graders would be if they have extreme mental disabilities and you want to keep them in a lower level test. You could move high-achieving 4th or 5th graders into it if you feel you are not getting a true score from them. One thing to look at as an indication is the student’s Standard Error. If it is reaching 5 or 6 or more, it may be an indication the student is “topping out” test; in other words, the program is running out of high level questions to give them.
Can you explain how projected
growth is determined? Is it straight from the RIT score or is it the RIT
Score plus student’s age or past performance?
- Projected growth comes from
our latest norming study. It is the mean of observed growth for
that grade, subject, season and starting RIT.
How come the projected growth is
the same?
- A couple of things happened
in the 2011 norming student that flattened out the growth projections. 1)
We had a much larger sample size – 5.2 million kids! When you are taking
the average of that many kids, things are going to flatten a bit. 2) Our
researchers took out the data of students who took a short time on the fall
test and a much longer time on the spring test. Those kids would have
shown “false” high growth, throwing off the mean. Essentially, they took
out the outliers.
- An important consideration
here though, is to remember that the projected growth is just that – an
estimate of how much the student will grow in a year’s time. If a student
is below grade level, he/she has to make more than that projection to catch
up! The projection basically keeps you where you are: If you are at
the 25th percentile in 5th grade, and you meet your
projection, you will go into 6th grade at the 25th
percentile.
What is the most reliable growth
report to measure a teachers’ effectiveness with the same group of students?
- This is more of a personal
preference than anything research-based: I think it’s best to look at Fall
to Spring. Teachers have to own that data, because they’ve had the
kids all year. When you go with Spring to Spring, they can make excuses
about the teacher last year, or learning loss over the summer. Just
too many other factors that come into play with S-S.
Common discussions:
It was hard to organize data in a manageable format. Here is a template that may help.
Use multiple measures to show proficiency with common rubric. Doesn’t need to be ODW only! It can be process writing as well. See the data sheet.
Resources to support you with writing:
Self and peer assessments are available in the U Drive- HP & WR SMART Goal- Self assessments.